Fodder harvesting to support an increase in grazing

Body

Closing soon. Don't miss out!

Your voice matters. Have your say on how we administer Australia’s national environmental protection laws as we strive for continuous improvement. Complete this survey to help shape our priorities and inform how we provide our services and conduct our activities.

The survey will be open until 11:59pm AEST Wednesday, 30 September 2026. If you have any questions, please contact: surveyhelp@nationalepa.gov.au

Case study
EPBC Act
Agriculture
Image
Photograph of King Island firebreak

Scenario

A cattle producer in south-west Queensland plans to expand fodder harvesting to support more grazing. The proposal includes large-scale mechanical lopping and clearing of 2,000 hectares of mulga woodland, including Category B regrowth.

Site details

  • Bioregion: Mulga Lands
  • Vegetation: Mature mulga and dense regrowth
  • Mapped habitat for the greater bilby
  • Mapped habitat for the kowari
  • Claypans present, used by migratory species after rain
  • Signs of threatened species found on site
  • Harvesting planned across multiple paddocks, including areas not previously harvested
  • Past harvesting was small-scale, but this is a large expansion

Activity

The producer plans to:

  • use machinery to lop and push over large areas of mulga across 2,000 hectares
  • harvest beyond strip-harvesting limits
  • repeat harvesting more often than allowed under the Queensland code
  • clear mulga in long strips to create grazing corridors
  • work close to claypans and drainage lines.

The activity is outside the scope of routine fodder harvesting under the Queensland code.

EPBC considerations

  • Large areas of mulga would be removed.
  • The vegetation may form part of a listed ecological community.
  • The activity is not small-scale, cyclical or easily reversed.
  • Claypans may support migratory species at certain times.
  • There is a high risk of impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES), including threatened species.

Outcome

A referral under the EPBC Act is required.

The scale, intensity and location of the activity mean it is likely to have a significant impact on MNES. A detailed self-assessment and referral are needed before the activity can proceed.