Fodder tree lopping for bushfire recovery

Body

Closing soon. Don't miss out!

Your voice matters. Have your say on how we administer Australia’s national environmental protection laws as we strive for continuous improvement. Complete this survey to help shape our priorities and inform how we provide our services and conduct our activities.

The survey will be open until 11:59pm AEST Wednesday, 30 September 2026. If you have any questions, please contact: surveyhelp@nationalepa.gov.au

Case study
EPBC Act
Agriculture
Image
Photograph of bushfire smoke over a farm

Scenario

After a severe bushfire, a cattle producer in central-west Queensland needs to feed livestock while pasture recovers. The producer plans to lop branches from fodder trees.

Site details

  • Bioregion: Brigalow Belt
  • Vegetation shows fire-affected regrowth
  • Fodder species include yellowwood and ironwood

Activity

The producer plans to:

  • lop branches to access leaf feed
  • not remove whole trees
  • follow Queensland fodder harvesting limits.

EPBC considerations

  • Lopping branches instead of removing trees helps keep habitat in place.
  • Care is needed as wildlife may be sheltering in remaining vegetation after the fire.
  • Avoiding heavy lopping reduces impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES).
  • Habitat for hollow-dependent species should be retained where possible.

Outcome

A referral under the EPBC Act is unlikely to be required if the activity:

  • follows the accepted development code
  • avoids impacts on MNES, including species using post-fire habitat.