Strip harvesting mulga for drought resilience

Body

Closing soon. Don't miss out!

Your voice matters. Have your say on how we administer Australia’s national environmental protection laws as we strive for continuous improvement. Complete this survey to help shape our priorities and inform how we provide our services and conduct our activities.

The survey will be open until 11:59pm AEST Wednesday, 30 September 2026. If you have any questions, please contact: surveyhelp@nationalepa.gov.au

Case study
EPBC Act
Agriculture
Image
Photograph of a mulga tree

Scenario

A sheep and cattle producer in South West Queensland manages a large property in mulga country. After two failed wet seasons, pasture is very low. The producer plans to strip-harvest mulga (Acacia aneura) to provide emergency feed for livestock.

Site details

  • Bioregion: Mulga Lands
  • Vegetation: Category X and Category B regrowth
  • Mulga is an approved fodder species under Queensland rules
  • No mapped endangered regional ecosystems in the harvesting areas
  • Mulga has been harvested on this property before

Activity

The producer plans to:

  • strip-harvest mulga in narrow bands using machinery
  • leave unharvested strips between harvested areas
  • follow required harvest intervals under Queensland’s Managing Fodder Harvesting Code.

EPBC considerations

  • Habitat fragmentation is unlikely because unharvested strips are left in place.
  • The activity occurs in existing fodder areas. This reduces the risk of impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES).
  • Harvesting must not reduce habitat below what listed species need.

Outcome

It is unlikely that a referral under the EPBC Act is required if the activity:

  • follows the accepted development code
  • avoids impacts on MNES.