Fencing for grazing management

Body

Closing soon. Don't miss out!

Your voice matters. Have your say on how we administer Australia’s national environmental protection laws as we strive for continuous improvement. Complete this survey to help shape our priorities and inform how we provide our services and conduct our activities.

The survey will be open until 11:59pm AEST Wednesday, 30 September 2026. If you have any questions, please contact: surveyhelp@nationalepa.gov.au

Case study
EPBC Act
Agriculture
Image
Photograph of a drilling ground rig

The situation

A grazier plans to install a new internal fence. This will:

  • support rotational grazing
  • protect a riparian zone.

The fence will run within 5 metres of an existing fence line in an area that has been previously cleared and used for grazing. No remnant vegetation is present.

Proposed activity

The grazier will:

  • install a new internal fence parallel to an existing fence line
  • use standard fence construction methods that cause only minor ground disturbance at post locations
  • avoid clearing native vegetation and confine all activity within the previously cleared area
  • use the fence to keep stock out of the riparian zone.

Key considerations

  • The fencing is a routine linear farm infrastructure activity rather than new development.
  • No remnant vegetation, threatened ecological communities, listed species habitat or protected matters occur within the proposed fencing line.
  • All works are confined to an area that has already been cleared and used for grazing.
  • The activity does not change land use, alter hydrology, or increase the scale or intensity of grazing operations.
  • The fence will improve environmental protection of a riparian area rather than create new impacts.
  • Any necessary approvals are addressed through state or local government processes.

Outcome

EPBC Act self-assessment or referral is not required.

The fencing:

  • occurs within a long-established agricultural area
  • involves minimal ground disturbance
  • does not affect Matter of National Environmental Significance.

It fits within recognised examples of routine farm infrastructure and agricultural exemptions.